page contents

AG refuses consent for contempt in opposition to Digvijaya Singh

The plea by advocate Sumant Sudan referred to 2 tweets by Mr. Singh.

Attorney General Ok.Ok. Venugopal has declined a plea to provide consent to provoke felony contempt proceedings within the Supreme Court in opposition to Member of Parliament and senior Congress occasion chief, Digvijaya Singh, for his tweets.

The plea by advocate Sumant Sudan referred to 2 tweets by Mr. Singh questioning whether or not the Supreme Court would declare the alleged sweeping powers of raid and arrest with out warrant given by the Uttar Pradesh authorities to the Special Security Force as unconstitutional or favour it beneath stress.

Mr. Venugopal stated he was replying on the idea that Mr. Singh really did make the statements.

Having stated that in his letter, the highest legislation officer opined the statements have been “wholly uncalled for”.

But he concluded that the tweets didn’t quantity to contempt of court docket.

“However, I do not believe that they merit action for criminal contempt of the Supreme Court of India,” Mr. Venugopal stated in his brief letter dated September 30.

The Attorney General’s prior consent is required beneath the Contempt of Courts Act to provoke proceedings.

In mid-September, Mr. Venugopal had declined permission to provoke contempt motion in opposition to senior journalist Rajdeep Sardesai for his tweets. In a one-page letter addressed to complainant, advocate Omprakash Parihar, Mr. Venugopal had reasoned that “trifling remarks and mere passing criticism, though perhaps distasteful, are unlikely to tarnish the image of the institution”.

In August, Mr. Venugopal had equally declined permission to a complainant who wanted to initiate contempt proceedings against actor Swara Bhasker for “scandalising” the Supreme Court along with her tweets on the court docket’s verdict within the Ramjanmabhoomi title dispute case.

The Attorney General had discovered no substance in that plea in opposition to Ms. Bhasker, saying her feedback relating to the Ramjanmabhumi verdict “appears to be a factual one” and contained her “perception” of the judgment.

The apex court docket had nevertheless discovered civil rights lawyer Prashant Bhushan responsible of felony contempt for “scandalising the court” along with his tweets commenting on an image of Chief Justice S.A. Bobde on a heavy bike and the court docket’s functioning up to now six years.

A digital court docket Bench led by Justice Arun Mishra, now retired, had punished Mr. Bhushan with a nominal advantageous of ₹ 1.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
%d bloggers like this: