page contents

Anti-cow slaughter legislation in U.P. being misused, says High Court

“Seized meat often not sent for analysis… some stuck in jail for offence that may not have been committed”

The Allahabad High Court has expressed concern on the misuse of anti-cow slaughter legislation in Uttar Pradesh.

“[U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter] Act is being misused against innocent persons,” the courtroom famous, because it granted bail to Rahmuddin, an individual from Shamli accused of cow slaughter.

The petitioner was booked in May beneath Section 3, 5 and eight of the Act in Thana Bhawan police station of Shamli. There have been no prices towards the petitioner within the FIR, mentioned the courtroom.

Counsel for the petitioner additionally knowledgeable the courtroom that he was not arrested from the spot, however he had been in jail since August 5.

“Whenever any meat is recovered, it is normally shown as cow meat [beef] without getting it examined or analysed by the Forensic Laboratory. In most of the cases, meat is not sent for analysis,” mentioned Justice Siddharth.

In an order dated October 19, the courtroom noticed that some proceed to be in jail for an offence that will not have been dedicated in any respect, or was triable by a Magistrate Class I and carried a most sentence of as much as 7 years. The choose mentioned each time cows have been proven as recovered, no correct restoration memo was ready and one didn’t know the place the cows went after the restoration. Goshalas didn’t settle for non-milching or outdated cows and so they have been left to wander on the roads.

Similarly, after milking the cows, homeowners permit them to roam on the roads, drink drainage or sewer water and eat rubbish and polythene, the courtroom added.

“Whether cows are on roads or in the fields, their abandonment adversely affects the society in a big way. Some way out has to be found to keep them either in the cow shelters or with the owners, if U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act is to be implemented in letter and spirit,” the courtroom mentioned.

It ordered the discharge of the applicant on bail on furnishing a private bond and two sureties of a like quantity to the satisfaction of the courtroom.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
%d bloggers like this: