page contents

Barrett Shines And Democrats Attack Trump on First Day of Confirmation Hearings

On Monday the Senate Judiciary Committee started to contemplate the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. Barrett herself was eloquent and galvanizing. Democrats barely talked about her, seemingly already giving up the battle towards her nomination, and targeted their hearth on President Trump.


Democrats Go At It With Republicans

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham opened with, “This is probably not about persuading each other unless something really dramatic happens. All the Republicans will vote yes, all the Democrats will vote no…In my view, the person appearing for this committee is in the category of excellent, something the country should be proud of.”

Democrats disagree, “We are now just 22 days from the election, Mr. Chairman. Voting is underway in 40 states,” stated Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, the rating Democrat on the committee. “Senate Republicans are pressing forward, full speed ahead, to consolidate the court that will carry their policies forward with, I hope, some review for the will of the American people.” Her opening phrases had been accountable in comparison with later Democrat babble.

Barrett Shines

But then Barrett took the stage and hit a house run along with her honest and clever presentation, “The policy decisions and value judgments of government must be made by the political branches elected by and accountable to the people. The public should not expect courts to do so, and courts should not try.”

“I was nine years old when Sandra Day O’Connor became the first woman to sit in this seat. She was a model of grace and dignity throughout her distinguished tenure on the court,” she added. “When I was 21 years old and just beginning my career Ruth Bader Ginsburg sat in this seat. She told the committee, ‘What has become of me could only happen in America.’ I have been nominated to fill Justice Ginsburg’s seat, but no one will ever take her place.”

RELATED: Trump Eviscerates Democrats For Handling Of Amy Coney Barrett Hearings

She then referenced Justice Antonin Scalia, whom she served as a regulation clerk.

“I felt like I knew the justice earlier than I ever met him, as a result of I had learn so lots of his colourful, accessible opinions. More than the type of his writing, although, it was the content material of Justice Scalia’s reasoning that formed me. His judicial philosophy was easy: A decide should apply the regulation as written, not because the decide needs it had been. Sometimes that method meant reaching outcomes that he didn’t like.

“Justice Scalia taught me more than just law. He was devoted to his family, resolute in his beliefs, and fearless of criticism. And as I embarked on my own legal career, I resolved to maintain that same perspective…Courts have a vital responsibility to enforce the rule of law, which is critical to a free society. But courts are not designed to solve every problem or right every wrong in our public life.”

Democrats Falter

During Democrat statements, Diane Feinstein, unusually, talked about a girl whose eyesight was failing when Mr. Obama signed Obamacare into regulation in 2010:

“Within weeks she was able to have cataract surgery. This saved her life. She described her reaction when she was able to get coverage through the California health exchange following passage of the A.C.A. And let me quote, ‘It was like heaven. I cried.’”

RELATED: Rules Matter In The Barrett Hearings

She cried, however these watching the listening to guffawed with derisive laughter at such a saccharine pitch.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, stated his constituents are “asking me to say no to this nominee mostly because they see her as a judicial torpedo aimed at their essential protections.” Uh no. Those doing the asking are his far left donors. Senator Amy Klobuchar and numerous others typically ignored Barrett and targeted on Trump and the virus.

“Democrats’ remarks were beside the point and had nothing to do with confirming Judge Barrett or her judicial philosophy…I do not know what any of that has to do with why we are here today,” stated Senator Ben Sasse, Republican of Nebraska. “A huge part of what we are doing here would be really confusing to eighth graders.”

Though most eighth graders can in all probability discover higher edification and leisure than a Senate listening to.

This piece was written by David Kamioner on October 12, 2020. It initially appeared in LifeZette and is utilized by permission.

Read extra at LifeZette:
Black Driver Lets Loose On BLM Protesters Blocking Street – ‘I’m Blacker Than You!’
Jake Tapper Gives Top Biden Official Free Lesson On The Constitution For Defending Biden’s False Claim
Kirstie Alley Torches Nancy Pelosi As ‘Evil’ For Launching 25th Amendment Scheme To Take Down Trump

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content material companions are their very own and don’t essentially replicate the views of The Political Insider.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
%d bloggers like this: