page contents

Many who see Trump as fascist ignore happenings in Hong Kong and Xinjiang

The October 1 op-ed, by Regina Ip, a member of Hong Kong’s Executive Council, captured such sentiments effectively. Ip laid out the case for a brand new Chinese-backed safety regulation that might successfully criminalize something that is likely to be perceived as “subversion.” Included was one of the disturbing passages I’ve learn in an American publication:

To some, the brand new nationwide safety regulation is particularly chilling as a result of it appears concurrently imprecise and really extreme. But many legal guidelines are imprecise, constructively so. And this one solely appears extreme exactly as a result of it fills longstanding loopholes—about subversion, secession, native terrorism, collusion with exterior forces. One individual’s “severe” is another person’s meant impact.

This time, although, no workers revolt occurred, although Ip’s article was an elaborate, if refreshingly frank, endorsement of actual fascism.

Outrage is all the time selective. I might have written about one thing else, however I made a decision to put in writing about this. The query stays: Why did readers who had been infuriated by Cotton’s argument appear to shrug off Ip’s? […]


  • In the Streets with Antifa, by Luke Mogelson. Trump is vowing to designate the motion as a terrorist group. But its supporters consider that they’re defending their communities—and that confronting fascists with violence could be justified.
  • U.S. Auto Insurance Industry Admits Systemic Racism, by Eve Kessler. A brand new business research reveals that auto insurers cost Black drivers with good data greater than white drivers with dangerous data — amongst different racist practices.
  • Even If Trump Loses, Republicans’ Authoritarian Ambitions Will Live On, by Jonathan Chait. School civics classes have boiled democratic values right down to inoffensive mush that we affiliate with clichés expressing supposedly common values (“government of the people, by the people, for the people”). But democracy is a radical idea, particularly in a society as unequal as ours. The rigidity between an financial system during which energy is concentrated in a couple of arms and a political system during which energy is distributed equally locations particular stress on the political forces aligned with the wealthy.



“We have to condemn publicly the very idea that some people have the right to repress others. In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousandfold in the future. When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers, we are not simply protecting their trivial old age, we are thereby ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations.”
            ~~Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956 (1973)



At Daily Kos on this date in 2007—FISA: Keeping Secrets:

The administration actually would not need the individuals to know what the NSA was doing and who they had been spying on with their warrantless wiretaps, to the extent that they are going to lastly launch the paperwork that the committee subpoenaed 4 months in the past. The Intelligence Committee has already seen these paperwork, they usually had been presumably sufficiently convincing sufficient for the entire Dems on the committee, excepting Wyden and Feingold, to help the FISA invoice popping out of Intelligence.

The White House has supplied leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee entry to authorized paperwork associated to the National Security Agency’s warrantless surveillance program, senators stated Thursday.

But Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., stated whereas the White House had supplied the paperwork to each him and the panel’s rating Republican, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, he was pushing for your entire committee to obtain entry to the paperwork. But he additionally stated he would reap the benefits of the provide and overview the paperwork.

As your entire Intelligence Committee, and workers, have seen the paperwork it appears ridiculous that your entire Judiciary Committee cannot see them as effectively. But what’s extra ridiculous is the truth that the data be withheld from the American public without end, which is what telecom amnesty would imply. 

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
%d bloggers like this: